Hamlet’s and Laertes’ Revenge: Which One Seems More Justified Essay

When whiz does an intentional (or even unintentional) act to the detriment of another, the aggrieved party or his or her be intimated ones may vow for vengeance against the perpetrator of the act. It has always been the kind of emotion that causes a person to feel hatred, show hostility, and display aggressive behavior, revealing the worst of him or her. punish washbowl sometimes be bitter and relentless, but some people also call it sweet and fulfilling at times. Thus, it has been a common theme and concept in literature. The world of literature has been flooded with numerous historys about penalize and its consequences.Although most of these stories are tragic and melodramatic, they have nonetheless created a remarkable impact on the readers intelligence about the reality and nature of strike back. Shakespeare has been proven by history itself to be a one-of-a-kind literary workman who was able to launch and create many successful tragic plays about revenge. One of his mo st normal plays about this emotion is that of the life of village, the prince of Denmark. In this play, hamlet found several reasons to kill and to make a lot of people suffer collectable to the death of his beloved convey who was mercilessly murdered.However, in the play, in that location is another character who had the resembling reason to of taking revenge Laertes, whose mother was killed by Prince small town himself, and whose babe killed herself because of the sorrow brought by their fathers death. Considering Hamlets and Laertes vow for vengeance, it can be inferred that although they twain share the same reason for being revengeful, scarcely Hamlets revenge appears to be excusable in the sense that he knew the uprightness behind his fathers death, whereas Laertes was blinded by Claudius lies and took revenge upon the maltreat person.Hamlets RevengeThe cause of death of Prince Hamlets father was in reality unknown to the entire kingdom. After his fathers deat h, his uncle Claudius married his mother and took over the throne. It was only when the temper of his father appeared in front of them when the real reason of his death was unfolded. The ghost revealed that it was actually the ambitious Claudius himself, the pal of Hamlets father, who killed him in order to put the entire kingdom as well as his wife in his possession.Angered by the ill-fate of his father and the unforgivable, abusive, and unsportsmanlike actions of his uncle Claudius, Hamlet vowed to take revenge on Claudius in order to give his fathers horrible death its due jurist. The knowledge of his fathers murder and of his mothers betrayal of her wedding vows with Hamlets father fill up him with so much anger and vengeful spirit, as clearly reflected in the following linesOh God A beast that wants discourse of reasonWould have mournd longer married with mine uncle,My fathers brother but no more like my fatherThan I to Hercules. Within a month,Ere yet the salt of most unr ighteous tearsHad left the flushing in her galld eyes. (1.2.150-155)This was the acquire of his revenge. After this point, he almost went mad with all the thoughts that kept running inside his head. He was lacerated between morality and his revengeful feeling towards his uncle and those people who betrayed his deceased father. However, if one would look closely and probe Hamlets revenge, although it may look relentless and heartless, it all boils down to the fact that Hamlet effected that his father, whom he loved so much, had been mercilessly killed for selfish reasons.His anger as a son can completely be understandable since readers would be able to understand that a sons love for his father will always be immeasurable. To think that Hamlet did all he could to be at the least careful of not punishing innocent people, it can be said that he neer aimed to do worse things than avenging his fathers death.Laertes RevengeJust like the reason behind Hamlets aggressive revenge, Laerte s also lost two of his love ones. That is why, in a fit of rage, he fearlessly faced Hamlet whom he believed was the sole reason behind the loss of his family. His father, Polonius, was accidentally killed by Hamlet who mistakenly identified him as Claudius, while Opehlia, Laertes sister, died by drowning herself into a river due to the unbearable tribulation caused by his fathers death. Thus, just like Hamlet, Laertes was crushed by the incidents, and he felt the same kind of anger and pain just like what Hamlet felt.However, recalling how Laertes got hostile towards Hamlet, it can be observe that Claudius made him believe that Hamlet was to blame for his fathers and sisters deaths. Hence, brokenhearted at that time and naturally vulnerable and helpless in that condition, Laertes was easily convinced and moved by Claudius words. Thus, he started to feel that overwhelming anger and drive to kill Hamlet regardless of what ways or exercise he had to go through. The events which occ urred next were a series conspiracies and plots that Laertes made in order to bring Hamlet down.He also went to Claudius to seek help and advice as to how to kill his mortal opponent. His mind was then foggy by Claudius deceiving words which allowed evil to close Laertes heart to anything and made him a relentless and merciless enemy of Hamlet. He also succumbed to the evil plans of Claudius that were designed to kill Hamlet in the surest of ways. Although Hamlet succeeded in cleansing Laertes first, he was still wounded by the sword covered with poison which immediately cut his glimmer shortly after Laertes fell to the ground. Thus, it may seem that the driving force behind Laertes revenge was the uselessness of Claudius.Unlike Hamlet, Laertes revengeful acts were pushed and encouraged by someone elses motives and intentions which were that of Claudius. As it appears, while Hamlet refractory on taking revenge on the people who brought upon his fathers death, Laertes, who wen t so weak to deception, was nonentity but Claudius dummy who did just what the deceitful character wanted, without knowing the truth behind the deaths of his loved ones.Which Revenge Appears More Justified?Upon exploring Hamlets and Laertes revenge, it appears clearly that both of them felt anguished and pained due to the death of their loved ones. The death of Hamlets dear father was so cruel and unjust that he himself felt that he should do what he can to make his fathers murderers compensation for the crime that they committed. On the other hand, the reason behind Laertes revenge was merely fed by Claudiuss lies who wanted to eradicate Hamlet as his opponent from the kingdom.It clearly implies that Laertes revenge was pushed through by deceitful and selfish reasons which covered his eyes from seeing the truth behind his familys death. With this, it can be right to say that Hamlets revenge is more justified in the sense that he knew the truth that his father has been murdered a nd therefore, justice must make the murderers pay for their crime, while in Laertes case, he had been so weak to deception that his anger and hostile treatment of Hamlet had no real and true basis. The tale which made him so angry had been fabricated by Claudius lies which made him fight for the wrong reasons and kill the wrong person.However, in whatever ways revenge is justified by others, it is still unacceptable to me since no one must take justice in his or her own hands. To fulfill their vengeance, Hamlet and Laertes had to hold justice in their hands, but as it appears, a person can easily be deceived therefore, ones revenge can always be misled, just like what happened to Laertes. Hamlets revenge only appears justifiable as he knew the truth completely. Thus, although Hamlet and Laertes shared similar reasons behind their revenges, only Hamlets revenge appears to be justifiable in this context.